Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
Forum rules
You can join the official testservers and support the testing staff anytime.
Be sure to share your feedback in the appropiate discord channel.
You can join the official testservers and support the testing staff anytime.
Be sure to share your feedback in the appropiate discord channel.
- Server PW: nimrocks
- Rcon Access (F2): test4321
- Tezcan
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:59 pm
- Location: Germany
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/Tezcan/
- Mapper profile: https://ddnet.tw/mappers/Tezcan/
- Clan: υηιqυє
- Website: http://uniqueclan.net
- Discord: Tezcan#8004
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
- cheats fixed
- gameplay changes
- gameplay changes
- Attachments
-
- Nalar.map
- (905.81 KiB) Downloaded 100 times
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
The map isn't releasable because the parts aren't fun and they are bad mapped. Rejected.
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
Map is releaseable, parts are not bad mapped and pro's will have fun here. Lexin also likes it.
Btw only 1 Tester shouldn't decide about rejecting a map anyway.
Unarchive, thanks.
Btw only 1 Tester shouldn't decide about rejecting a map anyway.
Unarchive, thanks.
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
Several people already disliked the map. It isn't like I'm the only one who doesn't like the map. If you aren't happy that a map gets rejected don't get it back like your opinion would overweight.
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:20 am
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/Welf/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Welf/
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
RayB i didn't see anybody besides you saying that the map is super bad and i see 2 experienced players, who say that the map is good enough to get released. You don't trust Silex if he is saying, that a map is good?
So either you show us some super bad parts, that make the map unreleaseable (then we can talk about it) or we release this map.
So either you show us some super bad parts, that make the map unreleaseable (then we can talk about it) or we release this map.
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
DataClaw and Jao already disliked the map and when I count myself to them we are 3. Both of them are also experienced like me and don't like the map. So Silex and Lexin's opinion wouldn't change much ? Except you want to let the the opinion of 2 "experienced" players overweight from which one couldn't even beat the first part lol and no I don't trust Silex since I made my own opinion.
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
This map has potential to get released and every part and some details are changeable, mr rayb-rage.
And btw the mappers does really care about their map, Tezcan posted a new version on Oct 02 with 'gameplay changes' which also means they are open for suggestions and want a enjoyable map.
(i don't need to be a pro to see which maps are good, just saying)
RayB. wrote:Jao already disliked the map
Does not look like jao dislikes the map that much, also he want to see more opinions too. Didn't saw that much more here in forum so you should wait with your rash decisions.jao wrote: The design is fine and the map has some good ideas, but the parts are so long and some parts are just copied ( 2 times tripple nade, 2 times same rocketfly).
The map is well mapped but especially DataClaw said he wouldnt play the map because its not fun.
Needs more opinions.
And btw the mappers does really care about their map, Tezcan posted a new version on Oct 02 with 'gameplay changes' which also means they are open for suggestions and want a enjoyable map.
(i don't need to be a pro to see which maps are good, just saying)
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:20 am
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/Welf/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Welf/
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
RayB why did you put this back into archive? I asked you to argue about the map, but instead you just press that "put into archive"-button 2 times after i put the map back into map testing?
That's no way of cooperating
And please trust me, i had a reason to put the map back into Map testing.
And please trust Silex and Lexin, when they say something, instead of just saying "we are more who dislike the map so archive", that's not how to deal with different opinons.
That's no way of cooperating
And please trust me, i had a reason to put the map back into Map testing.
And please trust Silex and Lexin, when they say something, instead of just saying "we are more who dislike the map so archive", that's not how to deal with different opinons.
- hi_leute_gll
- Posts: 2525
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 1:15 am
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/hi-95-leute-95-gll/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/hi-95-leute-95-gll/
- Clan: iMTG
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
Maybe you should think about if you want good maps or many maps and then apply fitting rules to these maps...
If you want good maps then release only good maps, if you want to release every finishable map then don't search for ridicolous reasons to don't release single ones. Actually these releases and the way maps get rejected looks very randomly. There are often no objective reasons why a map gets released and why others don't.
If you want good maps then release only good maps, if you want to release every finishable map then don't search for ridicolous reasons to don't release single ones. Actually these releases and the way maps get rejected looks very randomly. There are often no objective reasons why a map gets released and why others don't.
It's actually collaboration.Welf wrote:That's no way of cooperating
.hi._.leute._.gll. | iMTGmember
Re: Nalar by xPeke & Tezcan
You can try to guess who made these suggestions.Silex wrote: And btw the mappers does really care about their map, Tezcan posted a new version on Oct 02 with 'gameplay changes' which also means they are open for suggestions and want a enjoyable map.
For a enjoying map you need enjoying parts which doesn't exist in this map. I don't see the enjoyment in playing usual drag parts with a little space and some super faily parts between them. The map is maybe playable but not enyoing.
Yes but you actually said pros would enjoy playing the map. The only one who like it is Lexin.Silex wrote:(i don't need to be a pro to see which maps are good, just saying)
I only doubt that you can asses what the players would think about the map. You just builded up your opinion but I tested the map with the mappers and other players and had more opinions in consideration before declining the map.
I don't need to ? I said the map is bad and I have enough players who would agree with me to decline the map.Welf wrote: And please trust Silex and Lexin, when they say something, instead of just saying "we are more who dislike the map so archive", that's not how to deal with different opinons.
Silex said first the map would be good and pros would enjoy playing the map and I can prove the opposite. Now he says the map has potential. It shows me how unsure he is what to do with the map. I can't even verify his opinion.Silex wrote:Map is releaseable.
If you want to change parts do it instead of putting the map back again without doing nothing. I doubt you will come to a successful result.Silex wrote:This map has potential to get released and every part and some details are changeable, mr rayb-rage.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests