Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
-
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 9:27 pm
- Location: Poland
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/Themix/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Themix/
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
It's too faily for mod 3 idkkosho wrote:It is! 3* max. If you move this map to mod, it should be moved tons of maps.Themix wrote:planet mercury is not novice
- BannZay
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 12:26 am
- Location: Ukraine
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/BannZay
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/BannZay/
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
Banta 4* !!!
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
Verification 3.6 3 stars not even close for 4.
- Meliodafu
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:05 pm
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/Meliodafu/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Meliodafu/
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
4 stars is fine, the map is hard and faily, when you also look at the amount of finishes it fits fine, since there are just 4 finishes by good solo players.
iMTGmember
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
4 finishes cause 1 day after release and yes it's faily but not hard(standart 1 freeze jump)and only 3 min. It's mush easier than many 3stars map(atmosphere for exmaple it's almost 4 star but not this). Just compare this with other 4 star map. Only Broken Space(88 finished already) same and i dk why it's still 4 star cause all agree with 3 star just forgot to change.Meliodafu wrote:4 stars is fine, the map is hard and faily, when you also look at the amount of finishes it fits fine, since there are just 4 finishes by good solo players.
So 3 stars Broken Space and Verification 3.6
- hi_leute_gll
- Posts: 2525
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 1:15 am
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/hi-95-leute-95-gll/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/hi-95-leute-95-gll/
- Clan: iMTG
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
BannZay wrote:"All at the begining" 2* brutal
Ñı©Ø wrote:Oh and, even Hallow and Hallow 2! I failed at last part of Hallow 2... they're very faily and hard. 2* both.
Opinions to these maps?BannZay wrote:Banta - 4*
Absurd1(mix of hard and easy parts, but for done u should have some skill) 4*
Absurd5 - 4 *
benrace - 4*
Thor(long and faily) 4*
.hi._.leute._.gll. | iMTGmember
- Novo
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:41 am
- Location: germany
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/Novo-32-c-58-/
- Clan: mB.
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
Agree for all at the begining
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:20 am
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/Welf/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Welf/
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
(on ddmax) 'Blue Adventures 1' up to 2*
- IRGNW
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:46 am
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/IRGNW/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/IRGNW/
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
Microlity to 3
- hi_leute_gll
- Posts: 2525
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 1:15 am
- Player profile: http://ddnet.tw/players/hi-95-leute-95-gll/
- Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/hi-95-leute-95-gll/
- Clan: iMTG
Re: Suggest map difficulty re-ratings
Already yesterday 3 experienced players explained you why this map is fine with 4*...IRGNW wrote:Microlity to 3
.hi._.leute._.gll. | iMTGmember
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests